JR Group staff have been trying to catch Urahara Kisuke ever since the Ticket-Eating Hollow Incident of 2005, but somehow he just keeps evading them.
Japan's rail services are famous worldwide for their incredible efficiency and precision.
A misanthrope's dream come true. Possibly it is meant to function by contrast, but this bin was entirely on its own on the platform.
Having finally arrived in Hiroshima, and conscious of time, I used its remarkably fast and cheap tram service to head straight for the Genbaku-dome, formerly the Hiroshima Industrial Promotion Hall. A building right next to the hypocentre, the near-vertical way the blast hit it left a lot of the walls standing. Later, it was decided to preserve the building forever as a symbol of what had happened here.
First, though, a word about the city. What struck me most was how alive the place felt. The city's creed, soon to be explicated in the museums, was very obviously "rebuild and promote peace". It didn't feel at all dark or gloomy the way I thought a nonpareil disaster site might. It was, of course, also full of tourists.
Hiroshima: bright, shiny and modern. If I'd had time, I would have demonstrated this further.
I don't know if you can tell yet, but I like photographing rivers.
The dome itself. I was amazed by how much was still standing.
As you will see later, the number of surviving buildings like this near the hypocentre can be counted on one's hands.
Immediately across the river lies the Hiroshima Memorial Peace Park. Wide, very pretty and fairly crowded. Notable locations include the Children's Peace Monument, built after the death of the famous Sadako Sasaki, a hibakusha (A-bomb survivor) as a baby, who developed leukemia at the age of 12. While in hospital, she folded over a thousand paper cranes in accordance with the tradition that a person who does so will get their wish granted. In the event, it didn't work and she died, but it inspired the creation of the monument, and made paper cranes a globally recognised symbol for peace.
The monument. The displays behind it are filled with an inconceivable number of paper cranes, sent by people from all over the world, including by many schools.
From there I moved on to the Cenotaph, which houses a list of all the (known) victims, and is currently a shrine of sorts. People were queueing to pay their respects. Incidentally, hibakusha are taken very seriously in Japan - it took a while to admit the difficulties they faced (in part because the Allied occupation suppressed as much information about the bomb's effects as it could), and even longer to get anywhere with the necessary medical research, but today, for example, hibakusha are entitled to automatic free medical care as well as free entry to many of the museums and interesting sites I visited. Mind you, there aren't all that many left now.
View of the cenotaph from the Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum. Trying to take a closer shot was difficult due to crowding.
Behind the cenotaph burns the Flame of Peace, which will only be extinguished when the world's last nuclear weapon is destroyed. Sentiments like these cause the optimist and the pessimist in me to clash head-on.
Thence the museum. In true expression of Hiroshima's intent to spread knowledge of the terror of nuclear weapons as far and wide as possible, the entry fee is a negligible one - about 30p (audio guides cost more to rent, but I was fine without one). Inside, the crowding is horrific, but the museum is very well-designed. Around the perimeter of the central hall, a series of displays narrate Hiroshima's history, though skipping quickly over stuff before the Meiji era, going through its gradual militarisation as a vitally positioned harbour, to its role in conflicts such as the Korean War, as well as WWII, all the way up to 8.15 am on August the 6th, 1945.
I have to say, I admire the honesty with which these displays were written. At no point do they shy away from Hiroshima's own role in promoting war and suffering across the world - they acknowledge, for example, that due to the wartime government's conscription policies, a full tenth of the workers killed in the blast were Koreans shipped to Hiroshima en masse to work as forced labourers (they even get a separate memorial in the park as a result). Equally, they explain in detail the role of military forces originally based here in mainland conflicts, without attempting to justify them. They even discuss the Rape of Nanking - both what really happened and what the Japanese at home were told - and quote different estimates of the total number of victims (including the total typically cited in China). That's more than some Japanese history textbooks do. Plus, they offer a great insight into what the Japan of the time was like, both ideologically and in day-to-day life.
This is even more true when we get to wartime Japan - rationing, kids being shipped off to live with relatives in the countryside, air raids and blackouts...There's a very deep and painful irony in the fact that America was doing the exact same thing to Japan as Germany was doing to Britain, with the same consequences, even as each side was busy demonising the other. That said, the Japanese government seems to have been rather less merciful towards its people than the British one - we hear of metal collection laws which stripped even religious objects, not to mention things needed for everyday use, as well as people's houses being demolished to make firebreaks against air raids. Fundamentally, though, and it's a pity that the museum doesn't have the scope to cover this, the similarities between civilian experiences greatly outweigh the differences.
Further on, the displays change to a discussion of three central questions: "Why did America develop the atomic bomb?" "Why was the atomic bomb used on Japan?" and "Why was Hiroshima chosen?" The museum does not disappoint here either, and offers candid explanations backed up by an amazing number of memos, minutes and similar documents drawn from US archives. I had no idea that Einstein had signed a letter to Roosevelt urging him to pursue nuclear weapons research (though another scientist, Szilard, had actually been the driving force behind it). Of course, in the event, Szilard and the other scientists lost control of their creation to the military, which brings me to the part I found really interesting - the ethics of the bomb being used.
Before, I had always considered that one bombing to be a good thing overall, purely because we know the Japanese government was prepared to sacrifice every last civilian and soldier in mainland warfare if that was how America had to end the war. So I thought the sacrifice of that one city had saved way more lives, and generally a lot of Japan. However...then we have the Potsdam Declaration, the demand for Japan to surrender, which justified nuclear bomb use when Japan refused. Two points stick out. First, the declaration made no promise to maintain the emperor system - which was known to be the key to surrender (and evidently not a hard concession to make, since they did maintain it after all). Second, no mention whatsoever of the bomb. To me, that's a sort of sticking point. If Roosevelt and company had wanted to, they could have achieved the same effect by giving Japan fair warning and even letting them evacuate the city of choice - the power of the bomb would still be obvious (what with no buildings left standing within miles), and it's not like Japan could have developed countermeasures as it tottered on the edge of defeat. But the minutes make it clear that the bomb had to be tested, in the real world and on real people - they wanted the data, and they were also desperate to prove that all that research funding had not been wasted. All those documents are chilling because they don't even consider the human cost - not "necessary sacrifice" or anything, just "how can we do this most efficiently?"
Hiroshima was chosen from a shortlist for being big, relevant to warfare, and containing no Allied prisoner camps. Said shortlist, too, is scary to read - these people actually considered bombing Kyoto, for example. Mind you, they'd already destroyed most of it in air raids, but still...As for poor Szilard, he drafted a petition not to use the bomb unless Japan was fully appraised of what it was in for and still refused to surrender. The petition and its 70 scientist signatories were ignored.
The centre of the main hall housed scale models of Hiroshima before and after, as well as panels showing a set of telegrams: the successive mayors of Hiroshima have sent telegrams protesting every single nuclear test to have taken place since the war.
Hiroshima, early morning.
Hiroshima, afternoon.
Some of the telegrams, pretty much ignored.
After that, there were displays on Hiroshima's reconstruction, and the long road to fully understanding what happened. Photos of the A-bomb aftermath, for example, were banned from newspapers by the occupation forces. What was remarkable was the speed with which they rebuilt, and the survivors' intense commitment, not to hatred or mourning (which, under the circumstances, would have been entirely understandable) but to making sure nothing like this ever happens again. "World peace" is a phrase ubiquitous in the area I visited, more emphatic even than the efforts to show how terrible nuclear weapons are.
That said, there were also some excellent displays on nuclear weapons worldwide, their nature, political significance, and the NGOs working to eliminate them (many founded here). Did you know that since WWII there have been over 20 accidents involving nuclear material (including lost nuclear missiles and accidental launches)? Or that there have been over 20 occasions on which the USA has seriously considered deploying atomic weapons? It is a source of some wonder to me that all manner of important people from governments across the world have visited Hiroshima and left behind their (very powerful) impressions, yet the world is still as it is and nuclear disarmament seems like a distant dream.
Nuclear disarmament map. Well, I guess we're halfway there.
Once again, a mixture of optimism and pessimism. Yes, there are people working hard to get rid of nuclear weapons. Amazingly hard. Hiroshima is a place of hope. But all it takes is a single Vladimir Putin, even before the nation has been whipped up into a nationalist frenzy, and the chances of global disarmament hit zero for another decade. In the August 6th 2009 address, of which copies were displayed, the mayor of Hiroshima spoke of Barrack Obama and hope for change (and used the agonising phrase "Obamajority"), but are people really going to become sensible enough without a fundamental change in human nature? I guess all I personally can do is hope that change comes before someone in power does something really stupid.
Anyway, after that and a few halls of physical remnants of the blast (most powerfully, tattered sets of children's clothes, and the individual stories of the people who had worn them that day), I left the museum with time for one more destination, the Hiroshima National Peace Memorial Hall for the Atomic Bomb Victims. I've been using Wikipedia to check the names because they all sound sort of similar.
The Hall's purpose is to remember those who perished in the explosion and its aftermath, and it conjures a fairly still, though not intense, atmosphere.
Overground: a clock frozen at 8.15.
Underground, another clock and a panorama of Hiroshima after the blast, as viewed from the hypocentre. It is made of 140,000 tiles, equal to the number of victims.
A screen cycles through countless names and photos. The victim list is also searchable using computers off to the left.
I made it as far as a display hall containing video and written testimonies of the day of the blast. They were vivid, and painted such intense scenes of human suffering that I didn't go through them all, and ultimately left without looking through the much more vast archive room (computerised) across the corridor. Collecting and disseminating survivor testimonies is apparently one of the key activities of the museum and this place, and as such they make many available free online.
In a way, the whole thing had been too much to take in. Stalin once said "one death is a tragedy - a million deaths is a statistic". It was a bit like that. You can't grasp that level of suffering and destruction without actually having been there - and, judging from the testimonies, even if you were there it's still too much. The best you can do is put together enough pieces that they start looking like a picture. But, in the face of all that, Hiroshima's current state is truly inspiring.
As for me, I didn't have time to see anything else, but had to rush back. Things taking way more time than Hiroko estimated, I ended up having a very eventful journey. There are three types of shinkansen trains: the elite Nozomi ("wish"), the slower super-express Hikari ("light") and the all-stations express Kodama ("echo"). In one journey, I'd been on them all. I got on the Nozomi, even though my JR Rail Pass doesn't cover it, because I was in a hurry to get back for dinner (they never start until everyone's present) and consulting the timetable revealed that an ordinary Hikari, with the necessary changeover, would leave me seriously late (and the Saitos were expecting guests, too, though in the event those didn't turn up until near midnight). However, upon getting on, I watched a conductor prowling around the area (though not actually checking tickets) and decided that it was going to be a pretty miserable journey if I had to spend it terrified of detection (though I did have elaborate contingency plans). So I got off at the next stop, Shin-Kobe. Where I learned that the only train coming anytime soon was a Kodama. It was going to Shin-Osaka, a popular station and the Nozomi's next stop as well, and I hoped that I could pick up a Hikari from another line there and beat my original intended train considerably. Which is what I did. (as an aside, Nozomi is just like Hikari on the inside, except with more specialised areas like smoking carriages - but the Kodama had really comfy seats). I spent the last leg of the journey, from Shin-Osaka to Kyoto, chatting to an Irish traveller.
As for today, I have decided to shift my one day off to now, because otherwise lack of sleep would really be too much (though in the event, Koron's barking for a lot of the morning got in the way - never have I felt as strong a desire to murder another living creature as when that dog assaults my eardrums) and because tomorrow I'll need to get up very early indeed to beat the crowds to Himeji. And now, I am caught up on my blog. Rejoice.
P.S. The one interesting thing I've done today is walk along Kyoto's Kamogawa River (thanks to a friend for the helpful tip). It is surprisingly peaceful given that it's running through the middle of the city, and filled with interesting life-forms which were entirely unphotographable (seriously, one bird of prey must be a vampire, because it doesn't appear on camera even when I point it directly at it), though my timing meant I had to go in the early-afternoon heat which was not conducive to anything much.